Perancangan Arsitektur Enterprise Fase Arsitektur Bisnis dengan TOGAF ADM (Studi Kasus: MSI UNAMA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33998/jms.2024.4.2.1976Kata Kunci:
TOGAF ADM 9.0, arsitektur enterprise, sistem informasi terintegrasi, Magister Sistem Informasi, arsitektur teknologiAbstrak
Penelitian ini membahas penerapan kerangka kerja TOGAF ADM 9.0 untuk merancang arsitektur enterprise di Program Magister Sistem Informasi (MSI) Universitas Dinamika Bangsa Jambi. Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada fase-fase penting seperti fase preliminary, visi arsitektur, arsitektur bisnis, arsitektur sistem informasi, dan arsitektur teknologi, dengan tujuan mengembangkan sistem informasi yang terintegrasi. Program studi MSI mengalami beberapa permasalahan dalam proses bisnisnya, termasuk kurangnya media promosi yang efektif, sistem e-learning yang belum optimal, serta proses penilaian dan manajemen akademik yang belum terdigitalisasi sepenuhnya. Untuk mengatasi masalah ini, diusulkan pengembangan aplikasi berbasis web dan mobile yang dapat mendukung proses promosi, penerimaan mahasiswa baru, pengajaran, serta pengelolaan akademik dan administrasi. Rancangan arsitektur yang dihasilkan mencakup katalog portofolio aplikasi yang terintegrasi, yang diharapkan mampu meningkatkan efisiensi dan kualitas layanan akademik di program studi ini.
Unduhan
Referensi
A. Unger, M. Spinola, and M. Pessôa, “Requirements Engineering approaches to derive Enterprise Information Systems from Business Process Management: a systematic literature review.”
P. Badakhshan, K. Conboy, T. Grisold, and J. vom Brocke, “Agile business process management: A systematic literature review and an integrated framework,” Nov. 16, 2020, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2018-0347.
A. Trad, “The Business Transformation Framework and Enterprise Architecture Framework for Managers in Business Innovation: An Applied Holistic Mathematical Model,” International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 142–181, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJSSMET.20210101.oa1.
J. Manajemen dan Bisnis et al., “Penerapan Arsitektur Bisnis Intelijen Dalam Sistem Informasi E-Commerce Article History,” vol. 2, no. 3, 2023.
G. Emmanuel and S. Kusumawardani, “Pengembangan Model Proses Bisnis eLisa Dalam Pencapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran Universitas,” 2020. [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.mdp.ac.id
D. Proenca and J. Borbinha, “Enterprise architecture: A maturity model based on TOGAF ADM,” in Proceedings - 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2017, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Aug. 2017, pp. 257–266. doi: 10.1109/CBI.2017.38.
chernet Gebayew and A. A. Arman, “Modify TOGAF ADM for Government Enterprise Architecture,” International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT), Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICWT47785.2019.8978260.
B. Selwyn, “Poverty chains and global capitalism,” Compet Change, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 71–97, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1024529418809067.
J. Bair, M. Mahutga, M. Werner, and L. Campling, “Capitalist crisis in the ‘age of global value chains,’” Environ Plan A, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1253–1272, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0308518X211006718.
D. Walters and G. Lancaster, “Implementing value strategy through the value chain,” Management Decision, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 160–178, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005344.
D. Taibi and K. Systä, “A Decomposition and Metric-Based Evaluation Framework for Microservices,” in Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer, 2020, pp. 133–149. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49432-2_7.
Y. Abgaz et al., “Decomposition of Monolith Applications Into Microservices Architectures: A Systematic Review,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 4213–4242, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TSE.2023.3287297.
F. Amalina and Y. Handayati, “Business Process Analysis and Improvement in Selling Process Using Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) at Locarvest,” KnE Social Sciences, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.18502/kss.v4i6.6619.
D. Amyot et al., “Combining Goal modelling with Business Process modelling: Two Decades of Experience with the User Requirements Notation Standard,” Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, vol. 17, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.18417/emisa.17.2.
H. Tomaskova et al., “The business process model and notation of open innovation: The process of developing medical instrument,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 5, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.3390/joitmc5040101.
