Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Kepegawaian Dengan Standar ISO/IEC 9126 Pada Universitas Jambi

Penulis

  • John Devin Junior Simatupang Universitas Dinamika Bangsa
  • Effiyaldi Effiyaldi Universitas Dinamika Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33998/jurnalmsi.2024.9.1.1687

Kata Kunci:

Management Information System, Human Resources, UML, Prototype, Evaluation, ISO/IEC 9126, Quantitative Descriptive Analysis

Abstrak

In the current era of globalization, information technology or software is one of the important resources for
an institution or organization. Data processing in software as a strategic decision-making tool must be
supported by quality information systems and software. One of the information systems or software that
functions to assist management processes is the Human Resource Management Information System. The
quality of this system has a significant impact on the quality of the information generated. The data
collection method used a questionnaire and the data analysis used quantitative descriptive analysis. The
results of the data analysis show that the average value of Functionality is 3.97, Usability is 3.62, Reliability
is 4.11, Efficiency is 3.87, Maintainability is 3.63, and Portability is 3.79. In general, the software has
shown good performance or can be categorized as "Strong" in each analyzed characteristic.In the current era of globalization, information technology or software is one of the important resources for
an institution or organization. Data processing in software as a strategic decision-making tool must be
supported by quality information systems and software. One of the information systems or software that
functions to assist management processes is the Human Resource Management Information System. The
quality of this system has a significant impact on the quality of the information generated. The data
collection method used a questionnaire and the data analysis used quantitative descriptive analysis. The
results of the data analysis show that the average value of Functionality is 3.97, Usability is 3.62, Reliability
is 4.11, Efficiency is 3.87, Maintainability is 3.63, and Portability is 3.79. In general, the software has
shown good performance or can be categorized as "Strong" in each analyzed characteristic.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

P. Maharani and M. J. Effendi, “Evaluasi Kualitas Sistem Informasi Kepegawaian Dengan

Karateristik ISO/IEC 9126 (Studi Kasus Kantor BKD Kota Pagaralam),” Informatika, vol. 9, no.

, pp. 45–62, 2020, [Online]. Available:

https://www.ejournal.lembahdempo.ac.id/index.php/AMIK-JI/article/view/101.

S. Monalisa et al., “Evaluasi Kualitas Layanan Sistem Infromasi Manajemen Kepegawaian

(SIMPEG) Menggunakan Metode Servqual (Studi Kasus : Kemenag Kota Pekanbaru),” J. Sains,

Teknol. dan Ind., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 282–289, 2014.

E. P. Widoyoko, “Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran : Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon

Pendidik”,” vol. Volume. 9, 2017.

S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.

H. S. Husni, T. W. Tandra, and A. Anugrah, “Evaluasi Pengendalian Sistem Informasi Penjualan

Pada PT.XYZ,” Comtech, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 969–978, 2010.

Z. Arifin, Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya,

J. U. J. Gelinas and R. B. Dull, Accounting Information System, 8th Editio. South Western

Cengange Learning, 2010.

Jogiyanto, Sistem Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2009.

T. Sutabri, Konsep Sistem Informasi. Penerbit Andi, 2012.

S. Gondodiyoto, Audit Sistem Informasi: Pendekatan Cobit, Revisi. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana

Media, 2007.

“Pengertian ISO, Jenis, Tujuan, dan Kegunaannya yang Wajib Diketahui Pelaku Bisnis - Tempat

Belajar Digital Marketing,” 2018. https://belajardm.com/pengertian-iso/ (accessed Oct. 13, 2022).

“Pengertian ISO Menurut Para Ahli | Dilihatya,” 2019. https://dilihatya.com/2455/pengertian-isomenurut-para-ahli (accessed Oct. 13, 2022).

R. S. Wahono, “Teknik Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak,” Softw. Eng., 2006.

R. S. Pressman, Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2002.

J. A. McCall, P. . Richards, and G. Walters, Factors In Software Quality. New York: General

Electric Company, 1977.

S. Haryadi and W. Julianita, SPSS vs LISREL : Sebuah Pengantar Aplikasi Untuk Rise. Jakarta:

Salemba Empat, 2011.

Moekijat, Manajemen Kepegawaian. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1989.

Riduwan and Akdon, Rumus dan Data dalam Analisis Data Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2020.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta, 2011.

M. Jamil, S. F. Saputra, M. I. Wahid, and D. Riana, “Evaluasi Metode ISO/IEC 9126 pada

Kinerja Website Sistem Informasi Akademik Perguruan Tinggi,” Inform. Mulawarman J. Ilm.

Ilmu Komput., vol. Vol. 16, no. No. 1, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jim.v16i1.5209.

R. E. Al-Qutaish, “Quality Models in Software Engineering Literature: An Analytical and

Comparative Study,” J. Am. Sci., vol. 6(3), pp. 166–175, 2010.

I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit

Universitas Diponegoro, 2016.

S. Uma and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business: A skill Building Approach, 7th ed. New

York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2016.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-03-30

Abstract views:

7

PDF Download:

31

DOI:

10.33998/jurnalmsi.2024.9.1.1687

Dimension Badge:

Cara Mengutip

Simatupang, J. D. J., & Effiyaldi, E. (2024). Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Kepegawaian Dengan Standar ISO/IEC 9126 Pada Universitas Jambi. Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 9(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.33998/jurnalmsi.2024.9.1.1687

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama

1 2 3 4 5 > >>